Czemu? Przecież to nie jest rewolucja francuska z jakimiś ideałami uniwersalnego humanizmu, tylko A: normalna przemoc na tle etnicznym i rasowym, B: cała pseudo-ideologia wynika z konieczności utrzymania władzy, dodatkowo w obliczu jednoczącego zagrożenia z zewnątrz.
Poza tym, "rewolucje" wydarzały się na świecie znacznie wcześniej niż u nas w Europie, i to właśnie choćby w XV wieku.
Za wikipedią:
"The feudal rulers were called byachi, or military chieftains. However, this feudalism, whether by Kumyks, Avars, Kabardins or Chechens was widely resented by the Chechens, and the spread of gunpowder and guns allowed for a massive revolution to occur.[44]
The illesh, or epic legends, tell of conflicts between the Chechens and their Kumyk and Kabardin overlords.[45] The Chechens apparently overthrew both their own overlords and the foreign ones, using the widespread nature of the guns among the populace to their advantage.[45] As Jaimoukha puts it, "based on the trinity of democracy, liberty and equality" these were overthrown and the "tukhumtaip" legal system put into place, with the laws of adat.[45] The "tukhumtaip" system (see the section on Nakh peoples) functioned somewhat similar to that of a Western democracy, except that there was little importance of a centralized judicial branch (instead local courts held precedence), and that teip functioned like provinces, with representatives being elected by teip as well as by region.[46]
This revolution, making the Chechens the "French of the Caucasus", had a strong effect on the social and political mores of the Chechens. According to Amjad Jaimoukha, Chechen values based around democracy, freedom, ideological pluralism and deference to individuality date back to this event.[47]
Bunt rodzimej ludności przeciw obcym językowo, kulturowo i etnicznie feudalnym władcom. W sumie dokładnie taka sama sytuacja.
A tuż obok jest nie tylko Ajdynir, ale i Muria - która w zależności od sytuacji politycznej mogłaby sprzedawać broń rdzennej ludności, w ramach walki o strefy wpływów
